ExpressVPN vs Private Internet Access (PIA) is a choice between a streamlined premium VPN and a highly configurable value plan. ExpressVPN has a broader published location directory and post-quantum protection in its supported VPN protocols. PIA costs less on the observed long plan, allows unlimited devices and supports VPN-side port forwarding on eligible non-US servers. This guide compares published terms and technical features; we did not run controlled speed or streaming-access tests for this update.

ExpressVPN: easier premium setup
Strong TV and router pathways, 214 app-selectable locations, Lightway and supported post-quantum WireGuard. Basic covers 10 simultaneous VPN devices.
Check ExpressVPN offer
PIA: value and manual control
A lower observed long-term cost, unlimited devices, open-source apps, granular desktop split tunneling and supported-region P2P forwarding.
Check PIA offerQuick Comparison: ExpressVPN vs PIA
USD plan snapshot checked October 1, 2026. Monthly equivalents on long plans are paid upfront; terms, tax and route-specific discounts may change.
| Feature | ExpressVPN Basic | PIA VPN |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Simpler premium apps, post-quantum tunnel, guided router option | Low long-term price, unlimited devices, desktop control, P2P forwarding |
| Initial long plan | $83.72 for 28 months ($2.99/mo equivalent) | $79 for 39 months ($2.03/mo equivalent) |
| Published renewal | $99.95 each year | $79 every 3 years |
| Simultaneous VPN devices | 10 on Basic | Unlimited, subject to acceptable use |
| Countries / locations | 113 / 214 | 104 countries and territories / 170 |
| Protocols | Lightway, WireGuard; OpenVPN/IKEv2 on selected apps | WireGuard and configurable OpenVPN |
| No-logs assurance | KPMG assessed TrustedServer and controls in 2025 | Third Deloitte Romania assessment completed in 2025 |
| Eligible new-purchase refund | 30 days for new direct customers | 30 days; third-party store rules differ |
| Apple TV | Native app on supported tvOS | Native app on supported tvOS |
| Inbound VPN port forwarding | No | Yes, on supported non-US locations |
Country and location totals use each provider's definitions; locations can be virtual and do not represent individual hardware servers.
Pricing, Renewal Costs and Refunds
The general PIA checkout lists $79 for 39 months (about $2.03 monthly equivalent) and $79 every three years after the promotional term. ExpressVPN Basic lists $83.72 for 28 months ($2.99 equivalent) and $99.95 per year afterward. PIA's first charge is $4.72 lower and covers 11 more months; its listed renewal cadence is also much cheaper when normalized per year. Check the exact next charge date, currency, tax and any add-ons at checkout.
Long-plan first payment
Column chart · USD · unequal first-term durations
28 months
39 months
Renewal: annualized planning cost
Horizontal bars · USD/year based on published renewal terms
PIA actually charges $79 every three years; $26.33/year is a calculation, not an annual payment.
PIA also lists $47.88 for a one-year term and $11.95 for a monthly plan. Both providers advertise a 30-day guarantee for eligible new direct customers, with app-store purchases following store rules. PIA's checkout says “new subscribers only” while its legal terms also discuss initial or renewal requests; verify eligibility with support rather than assuming a renewal refund. Turning off auto-renewal is separate from asking for money back.
Network Coverage and Device Capacity
ExpressVPN lists 113 countries and 214 app-selectable locations. PIA's late-September expansion brought it to 104 countries and territories and 170 locations, including coverage in all 50 US states. ExpressVPN still leads this pair on published country and location breadth; PIA now reaches substantially further than older 91-country claims suggest. Both use selected virtual locations, and neither publishes one stable, comparable global hardware-server count.
Published location coverage
Horizontal bars · app-selectable locations, not physical server counts
PIA allows unlimited simultaneous paid connections under its acceptable-use rules. ExpressVPN Basic permits 10; Advanced permits 12 and Pro 14. One compatible router tunnel can cover connected household devices, but router hardware and settings affect performance and control.
Ten-device household illustration
Donut graphic · ExpressVPN Basic capacity vs PIA's unlimited-device policy
Security, Privacy and Independent Audits
Both providers describe RAM-only VPN infrastructure, private DNS andkill-switch protection. ExpressVPN uses TrustedServer to reload a controlled image, while PIA says its NextGen fleet operates on RAM-only systems. Their stated 10 Gbps and selected 40 Gbps links are server-side capacity figures, not speeds that any individual subscriber is guaranteed to receive.
ExpressVPN security strengths
Open-source Lightway uses hybrid post-quantum key exchange; ExpressVPN also documents post-quantum WireGuard on iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, Linux and Apple TV. Its Internet Kill Switch and Lite Protection vary by platform. The VPN tunnel's post-quantum design does not make destination apps quantum-safe.
PIA security strengths
WireGuard and configurable OpenVPN, ordinary and Advanced Kill Switch modes, MACE DNS-domain blocking, custom DNS and OpenVPNMulti-Hop through Shadowsocks or SOCKS5 give advanced users more control. MACE is not antivirus; Multi-Hop is a proxy followed by the VPN, not two independent VPN tunnels.
KPMG assessed ExpressVPN's TrustedServer and privacy controls as of February 2025. Deloitte Audit Romania completed PIA's third no-logs infrastructure engagement in late 2025, announced February 2026; PIA also publishes open-source apps and transparency reports. ExpressVPN is based in the British Virgin Islands and PIA in the US; both are Kape-owned. Audit scope, logging practices and technical controls matter more than jurisdiction alone, and every assessment is tied to the systems and time it examined.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation's encryption guide explains a VPN's trust boundary: the provider can see traffic that the local network or ISP otherwise might. HTTPS, account security and careful provider selection still matter.
Speed and Real-World Performance
ExpressVPN's Lightway and PIA's WireGuard are both efficient modern protocol choices. PIA also lets you tune OpenVPN settings, while ExpressVPN offers WireGuard and selected OpenVPN/IKEv2 options. Performance depends on your ISP, Wi-Fi, distance to the exit, congestion, hardware and time of day. Older charts claiming fixed Mbps by country or universal speed-retention percentages do not establish a reliable winner.
ExpressVPN's Lightway Turbo can use multiple Lightway UDP tunnels on supported Windows setups. Its advertised best-case gain is an internal conditional figure. Turbo changes interface behavior, so users binding a torrent client to a VPN adapter should verify their configuration or disable Turbo. PIA's 10 Gbps infrastructure is likewise a capacity claim rather than measured household throughput.
Streaming, Apple TV and Smart DNS
Both services have native apps for supported Apple TV, Android TV and Fire TV hardware. ExpressVPN offers MediaStreamer for selected devices without a native VPN app; PIA offers Smart DNS and streaming-optimized locations. These DNS-only fallbacks do not encrypt the device connection or provide ordinary VPN IP-location flexibility. A native app or compatible router is the right path when VPN privacy matters. Service access can change by account, device, catalog and exit IP.
Netflix stable-speed guidance
Service recommendation, not a measured VPN benchmark
Netflix recommends at least 15 Mbps for 4K, 5 Mbps for 1080p and 3 Mbps for 720p. A VPN can reduce available speed, and neither provider guarantees a catalog. Our streaming VPN guide compares more TV setup paths.
Torrenting, P2P and Port Forwarding
Both VPNs support ordinary outbound P2P. PIA has an important distinction: its app can request an inbound port on supported non-US VPN locations. That can improve peer reachability when you enter the assigned port in a torrent client. The port, eligible locations and platform implementation can change. ExpressVPN does not offer VPN-side inbound forwarding; router forwarding outside its tunnel does not provide VPN-protected inbound access.
Use the kill switch, confirm the client is routed through the VPN and test for leaks before transfer. PIA's Advanced Kill Switch can block ordinary traffic even while the VPN is off on supported desktop apps. ExpressVPN users who bind a client to a conventional tunnel adapter should check Lightway Turbo behavior on Windows. Our torrenting VPN guide covers forwarding needs in more detail.
Apps, Split Tunneling and Routers
PIA publishes open-source clients and offers app rules plus IPv4/IPv6 address or subnet exclusions on Windows, macOS and Linux. Windows and Linux can also control whether DNS follows split-tunnel rules; Android supports per-app routing. ExpressVPN documents split routing on Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS, plus router groups. ExpressVPN's desktop IP/subnet rules are useful, but iOS exclusions are limited to individual IPv4 addresses. Platform details differ on both services.
ExpressVPN's current guided retail router option is Fortify, made with GL.iNet on the Flint 2 platform. Aircove and Aircove Go retired from sale; existing owners have announced support periods. Fortify's advertised maximum is a controlled router capability, not guaranteed internet throughput. PIA can be configured on compatible routers manually, which gives enthusiasts flexibility but usually requires more setup. Read our VPN router guide for hardware considerations.
For full product details, see our ExpressVPN review and PIA review.
Travel, Restrictive Networks and Gaming
ExpressVPN's Lightway can automatically adapt connection behavior on restrictive networks, and its 113-country network gives more national exit choices. PIA has OpenVPN Multi-Hop through Shadowsocks or SOCKS5, which may help on some blocked networks but is not a universal stealth system. No VPN can promise access through every firewall; install before travel and check local rules.
For gaming, ExpressVPN's router pathway can cover consoles and PIA's app offers visible location choices and forwarding on supported non-US servers. Neither guarantees lower ping, open NAT or protection from every denial-of-service attack. Choose a nearby exit and compare latency, packet loss and matchmaking with and without the VPN.
Final Verdict: Which VPN Should You Choose?
Pick ExpressVPN if…
- You value a simpler app and guided Fortify router option.
- You need the extra published countries or locations.
- You want shipped post-quantum tunnel protection.
- Ten Basic device slots cover your household.
Pick PIA if…
- Long-term price and renewal cost matter most.
- You need unlimited simultaneous devices.
- You want open-source apps and granular desktop controls.
- You need VPN-side forwarding on eligible non-US exits.
ExpressVPN is the easier all-purpose pick for a streamlined TV and router setup. PIA is the stronger value and power-user pick, especially for large households and P2P. Their privacy evidence is substantial on both sides, and real-world speed needs a device-specific test. Confirm the live checkout and use the eligible refund period to test your own route.
Frequently Asked Questions
How we compared these VPNs
We reviewed provider checkouts, refund terms, server directories, device and protocol documentation, router information and independent assurance summaries on October 1, 2026. The charts show published first charges, calculated renewal equivalents, provider location counts, an illustrative household and Netflix playback recommendations. We did not purchase subscriptions or collect matched speed, latency, leak or streaming-unblocking results. Offers and available locations can change.